国際健康科学会大会 （東京）　抄録集 2000.11.05

Jessel-Kenyon, J, Pfeiffer, L, Brenton, M. A statistical comparison of repeatability in three commonly used bioelectronic devices: Kirlian photography, the segmental electrogram, and the AMI of Motoyama. Acup in Med 16(l):40-42,1998.

Abstract
Kirlian photography, taken with high voltage and high frequency mainly of hands, requires careful standardized con ditions. Segmental electrograms measure skin impedance in 8 body segments, before and after stimulation with a very small current (not physiologic). The AMI was designed by Motoyama 20 years ago to diagnose organ deficiency or excess, with application of a 10 millisecond 3 volts at the Ting points of the meridians. All three are said to provide information regarding bodily dysfunction. Here, 30 patients were tested with each apparatus on 2 consecutive days under careful identical conditions for repeatability. Only the AMI appeared consistent, indicating it could be a useful clinical tool; the other two had too much variation.

和文書籍

気の流れの測定・診断と治療

本山　博著　1985年

AMIによる神経と経絡の研究

本山　博著　1988年

全身咬合

尾澤文貞著　1990年

咬合補綴法

デンティスト臨床研究会編　1992年